Surviving the Fourth Reich

Political cartoon by Bramhall for the NewYork Daily News.

I don’t know what’s going to happen under the Fourth Reich any more than you do. The election hit me like the Acme Safe hit Wile E. Coyote, and I disappeared beneath the weight of it for a while. I needed to think, to process the horror that just happened. Although it was less a present horror than a realization of the nastiness to come.

My preference at this point is frankly to say fuck it and leave this country.  I honestly have no hope for us. A citizenry that would elect a career criminal, a rapist, a profoundly stupid and uneducated man, and an obvious traitor does not seem to me like a good place to live, and I think Trump and his cronies are all too eager to prove that. 

Unfortunately, my preferences are not the guiding factor here. I have a large, close, and loving family. I cannot leave them, and they are at this point unwilling to go. They point out that we don’t know what is going to happen. This is true, but I think I’m on solid ground by saying it will be bad. “Stay and fight!” say some. My issue with that is “How?” I have been fighting for liberal causes my entire adult life, only to find my efforts wasted in the face of a galactically stupid and uninformed electorate. Remember? You can’t fix stupid. You can thank the Republicans for dumbing down our educational system for the past 45 years or so.

After several weeks of mourning for a country that I guess never existed, I came to a few conclusions about how to get through this if I can’t leave. I don’t mean get through this intact—just survive the coming tide of chaotic evil. I would like to share my conclusions with you, and I invite you to share yours with me. This is a time when people who have a conscience, integrity, empathy, decency, and love need to stand together against those who do not.

For me, it comes down to protecting oneself and one’s family. I do not see that there is anything I can do to affect what will be happening on a national scale, or even a state level. I believe that ordinary families—not billionaire families, perish the thought!—will be facing certain threats in these areas:

  • Food safety and continuity of the food supply chain
  • Healthcare
  • Finances/cost of living
  • Disinformation/biased reporting

The country is now an oligarchy, fronted by a kakistocracy. An oligarchy is a government run by corporations. A kakistocracy is a government run by the worst of society. We have been living in an oligarchy for quite some time, thanks to the Republicans—remember Citizens United? Now the corporations will have even fewer boundaries, regulations, or limits on what they do. We already know what they do when the restraints are off:

  • Profiteer, raising prices unreasonably and unnecessarily in pursuit of ever-higher profits
  • Create shoddy products for higher prices—or sell you less for more
  • Create harmful products for which they will never be held accountable
  • Slash customer service
  • Cheat (remember Enron?)

That means that the rest of us will have more trouble making ends meet—and in some cases, even getting our basic needs met. If Trump does what he did the last time, he will endanger food safety by firing USDA agricultural inspectors, opening the gate to listeria, e. coli, salmonella, and a host of other food-borne diseases, most of them extremely dangerous. This in turn endangers the food supply chain. There will also apparently be tariffs on certain foreign goods, which means that the healthy and nutritious food we get from Mexico, for example—like avocados and mangos—will become exorbitantly expensive. Because tariffs don’t hurt the foreign seller—they hurt the U.S. buyer. Trump just can’t get that through his stupid pumpkin head.

Avoid Giving Huge Corporations Your Money

There’s only one way to resist: break your ties to the corporations to the extent you can. If you don’t buy their stuff, they can’t hurt you. Amazon would be a great place to start. My husband thinks that is ridiculous—Amazon does things right. They have great customer service. They have rapid delivery. They have good prices (sometimes). They have great variety. They keep track of everything for you. They are incredibly convenient.

And Amazon is a ginormous corporation that threatens every small business on the planet. Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s owner, owns the Washington Post, which served us poorly over the past nine years and capitulated in advance of Trump’s victory by refusing to endorse a presidential candidate after the staff had prepared to announce Kamala Harris. He’s busy cozying up to the new regime as we speak. Do you really want to give him more money?

So I decided to cut Amazon out of my life unless there was really no other way to get what I wanted or needed. This has not been easy, but I am doing it in stages. I get ebooks and audiobooks now through an app called Chirp or through the free library app called Libby. I order other products directly from the manufacturers or non-Amazon suppliers. Is it more work? A bit, but worth it to be free of Amazon. It’s tough to get to 100%. I try to purchase products online directly from the manufacturer or other suppliers, but sometimes I can’t do this. Amazon is like a metastasized cancer. I recently ordered Christmas candles from the Petalura catalog. They arrived with my latest order from Amazon. They are listed in my Amazon purchases. More and more, we really don’t know with whom we are doing business.

Take the same approach to other things you buy. Shop at locally owned businesses as much as possible. Question your choices. I used to buy a lot of personal care items from the drug store or wherever without really thinking about it. I became allergic to a lot of random things and began to scrutinize the ingredients very carefully. A hand lotion from the drug store can have 25 ingredients or more, most of which are unpronounceable chemicals. I started making my own dry skin salve with just three ingredients. (It’s easy. It’s also cheap.) I make some of my own condiments instead of buying bottles at the grocery store. We cook whole foods from scratch (purchased at a locally owned market), and avoid processed foods, which are bad for you anyway. All the garbage that corporations pour into their products, or feed their agricultural animals, or include in their packaged foods is just plain bad for human beings. And the more of this stuff we consume, the sicker we get, and the healthier the corporations’ profit margins. This will not improve under the Fourth Reich, because this government will be about making the wealthy oligarchs even more wealthy. It’s definitely not about YOU.

The old refrain of “make do, re-use, repair, recycle” further protects us from corporate control. Making something last longer is good for your wallet. Get over the idea that everything has to be new and stylish—who told you it had to be new and stylish? Right—the corporations who thrive on our lust for the latest thing. Consider bartering things you don’t need for things you do. There are specialty barter groups aimed at moms, for instance, where mothers can trade clothes, baby equipment, and toys. You can find barter groups online—I can’t recommend any because I have just started looking into this myself. Also, consider passing along unused and unwanted possessions to others who want or need them. There are “freecycle” groups in every community. 

“New to me” is just as much fun as “new.” I buy most of my clothes on eBay because I don’t care if the clothing is new as long as it is in good condition and looks good. I can get designer clothing inexpensively and support individual entrepreneurs instead of corporations.

When I suggested some of this on FaceBook, many thought I was saying “Hurt the corporations by not buying their products.” That is not what I am saying. I do not think the corporations will be harmed if you cut your spending, although I wish I could say otherwise. No, this is about protecting you and your family, not about going after the billionaires and their companies. The less you rely on giant, impersonal, and soon-to-be-unregulated corporations, the better.

Obviously, you can’t get to 100% on this. There are too many obstacles, obfuscations, and dependencies—unless you decide to go off-grid and live off the land. 

Protect Yourself Against Disruptions to the Food Supply

If Trump again fires USDA inspectors or in some other way disrupts the safety of the food supply, we all need to make some choices. Consumption of meat, fowl, and fish may become more hazardous. It is possible to contaminate vegetables and fruits as well, but less likely, and vegetables and fruit can be washed. In the event of a serious threat to food safety, I intend to eat vegetarian food. I like it, it can be prepared in a million versatile ways, and it is generally speaking better for you. 

There is another way to detach yourself from huge corporations—eat less processed food. Some processed food is fine—frozen vegetables, for instance. Freezing is just a good way to preserve food. But a lot of processed food has ridiculous amounts of added sodium, nitrates, sugar, preservatives, artificial dyes and chemicals, etc. As an examples, in a single-size package of Yoplait yogurt (6 ounces), there are 19 grams of sugar (nearly two-thirds of an ounce) and 90 ml of sodium. Yoplait, despite yogurt’s reputation as health food, is just junk. Say no to processed food to resist the oligarchy (and be healthier, too).

I am also in the process of collecting and storing staples for long-term storage such as flour, sugar, salt, pasta, canned goods, dry beans, water, etc. I’m not going nuts and gathering years’ worth of food—just enough to get by in the event of an emergency. It could be a waste of time and money. Or it might get this family through a bad patch—there’s no way of knowing right now.

Producing some of your own food gives you a bit of distance from the corporate control of what goes in your mouth. Apartment living makes this hard to do, but if you have a small amount of land available, you can at least produce some vegetables. We have a small vegetable garden, some fruit trees, and backyard chickens. That isn’t going to provide enough food to sustain a family for long, but it’s at least something we can do to be more independent.

Threats to Health Care

It’s impossible to say at this time what the specific threats are to our access to health care. Judging by Trump’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we’d better hope there isn’t another pandemic because we know he doesn’t care if we live or die. Also of concern is his pick for head of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. RFK Jr. does not believe in vaccines. He has a history of making false statements and believes in debunked conspiracy theories on subjects like HIV and AIDS, antidepressants, and autism. If there were another pandemic would we have a militarized response to vaccine development—or would RFK block this? I don’t know. I doubt if RFK Jr. knows, frankly, and it makes me nervous.

The Kakistocrats want to destroy Social Security and Medicare. Also the Affordable Care Act (the ACA, or “Obamacare”). I guess I don’t have to say much more to indicate how this would devastate our population, especially seniors, the disabled, and the poor. Again, I have no idea how this will play out, nor do I have any bright ideas about how to protect yourself against this particular brand of idiocy. The best I have to offer, for those that can manage it, is seek medical and dental care in Mexico if our healthcare system goes south. The national healthcare system in Mexico is modern, well-developed, and affordable. Any town in Mexico with an American expat population will also have dentists and physicians that are competent and speak English. There are lists of towns with American expat populations online.

Misinformation/Biased Reporting

Misinformation is why we are in this position to begin with. The world has been flooded with lies, conspiracy theories, and fear-mongering, and apparently a fair number of people have lost their minds because of it.

Making the situation worse is that the mainstream media (MSM) in this country has abandoned its responsibility to report the truth and rolled over to appease its new master. Here are a few examples:

  • Trump sued ABC because George Stephanolpoulos stated that a jury found that Trump had raped E. Jean Carroll. To lose this case, Trump would have had to prove actual malice, whereas Stephanopoulos had merely been reporting the facts. But ABC caved to placate Trump.
  • Time Magazine named Trump Person of the Year. I know they once named Hitler Person of the Year, but I guarantee you Trump saw this as homage to his greatness, not a burn.
  • Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, hosts of MSNBC’s flagship AM program “Morning Joe,” went down to Mooch-a-Lago to kiss the ring. I guess they forgot all about Trump’s attacks on them some years ago, when he accused Mika of “bleeding all over the place” from plastic surgery when she visited the Golden Palace.
  • And then there’s Bezos, showing his underbelly to the dictator and hoping that he won’t be kicked to the curb.

I can’t take the space to document all the MSM mentions of “he was joking” or downplaying some atrocity that Trump committed or intends to commit. Bottom line, our former bastion of free speech, the media, is suspect and can’t be trusted.

We certainly can’t trust social media, either. Anything we see on social media should be vetted and verified before it is passed along—but how do you verify it? Are there media out there that are unbiased and reporting the truth? I don’t know. National Public Radio and the Public Broadcast System (NPR and PBS) appear to still be providing actual news—although I have caught even them making statements that soften the reality of what Trump and the Republicans are doing. The MAGATs want to destroy these organizations by defunding them. What they don’t realize—because they know nothing about how this government works—is that NPR and PBS don’t have much government funding. So donate to these organizations to make up for the small amount of funding they will inevitably lose. And let’s hope they don’t join the MSM in pandering to the new regime.

Let me know if you have discovered more reliable, independent news sources by leaving a comment. Also, are any of the major newspapers in this country trustworthy? Boston Globe? Chicago Times? Christian Science Monitor? Anything? We may end up looking to English-language media from other countries to figure out what’s real and what isn’t.

What Do YOU Say?

I would be interested in your ideas for surviving the coming years under the oligarchic kakistocratic Fourth Reich. As I said, we must stick together and help one another out. As Ben Franklin once said, we hang together or we hang separately.

Please leave comments. I welcome your ideas.

Project 2025: What’s All the Fuss About?

What is Project 2025? Project 2025 is a blueprint for actions the Trump administration should take once it regains power. It was sponsored and paid for by the Heritage Foundation, and an extreme right-wing think-tank.

Trump has tried to distance himself from Project 2025, but he can’t. The name “Trump” is mentioned approximately 201 times in the text, not counting footnotes or author bios. The people who wrote Project 2025 are all Trump adherents and colleagues. More than 140 people who formerly worked for him are involved, including former chief of staff Mark Meadows and advisor Stephen Miller. J.D. Vance wrote the forward. Six of his former Cabinet secretaries were also involved. (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-claims-not-to-know-who-is-behind-project-2025-a-cnn-review-found-at-least-140-people-who-worked-for-him-are-involved/ar-BB1pN666?ocid=feedsansarticle) If you go to the full text of Project 2025 that I posted at https://theobsidianmirror.net/project-2025-in-its-entirety/ , you will see a lot of names from the Trump Administration. So I think we can lay to rest the notion that Trump doesn’t know the people behind Project 2025 or anything about it, as he claims.

The following is just a smattering of the extreme and dangerous measures Project 2025 advocates. I had to cherry-pick or this post would be as long as the Project document. The interpretation of what is being proposed is mine. If you disagree with my take, please go read Project 2025 for yourself at https://theobsidianmirror.net/project-2025-in-its-entirety/

What actions does Project 2025 advocate? Project 2025 is nearly 900 pages long, and the language is not always as direct as its meaning. For example, it says, “”For the sake of child well-being, programs should affirm that children require and deserve both the love and nurturing of a mother and the play and protection of a father.” This does not baldly state that Republicans want one man with one woman to be the only legitimate form of marriage–but it clearly means that the Republicans want one man/one woman to be the only form of acceptable marriage.

If you want to take solid action against Project 2025, I recommend filing a formal complaint against the foundation with the IRS for violating the injunction against political activity or expression for 501c3 non-profits. If you read Project 2025 or have a good understanding of it, it is clearly in violation of the foundation’s non-profit status. I have created a page on this blog called “Filing a Complaint Against the Heritage Foundation (https://theobsidianmirror.net/file-a-complaint-against-the-heritage-foundation/), and it contains a copy of the complaint form and accompanying letter that I filed with the IRS–so I’ve done the work for you. Start by downloading Form 13909 from irs.gov.

Family and Marriage: Project 2025 is clear that the only legitimate marriage is between one man and one women. A quote from the Project: “Protect faith-based grant recipients from religious liberty violations and maintain a biblically based, social science–reinforced definition of marriage and family.” When they say “Biblical,” they are specifically leaving out all but the Christian and (maybe) Jewish religions. Of course, anyone familiar with the Bible knows that there are many different versions of marriage on offer in the Bible, but the authors of Project 2025 are oblivious to this.

From Project 2025: “Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families.” Obviously, by “nuclear families,” they do not mean “same-sex families,” and they are making that clear.

“Additionally, Congress should pass the Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act62 to ensure that providers and organizations cannot be subjected to discrimination for providing adoption and foster care services based on their beliefs about marriage.” In other words, religious-based adoption agencies will be free to discriminate against LGBTQ+ couples and anyone who doesn’t fit the Republican definition of marriage.

“The HMRE program should receive a fair and realistic assessment. Additionally, the positive role of faith-based programs should be protected— 481 —Department of Health and Human Services and prioritized so that these programs do not receive undue scrutiny or pressure to conform to nonreligious definitions of marriage and family as put forward by the recently enacted Respect for Marriage Act.” In other words, discrimination against anyone who does not conform to the ReThuglikkkon idea of marriage is fine.

“Protect faith-based grant recipients from religious liberty violations and maintain a biblically based, social science–reinforced definition of marriage and family. Social science reports that assess the objective outcomes for children raised in homes aside from a heterosexual, intact marriage are clear: All other family forms involve higher levels of instability (the average length of same-sex marriages is half that of heterosexual marriages); financial stress or poverty; and poor behavioral, psychological, or educational outcomes.” This references a study performed by The New Family Structures Study (abbreviated NFSS), a sociological study of LGBT parenting conducted by sociologist Mark Regnerus of the University of Texas at Austin. The study surveyed over 15,000 Americans of ages 18 to 39. The first research article based on data from the study was published in July 2012 in Social Science Research, and concluded that people who had had a parent who had been in a same-gender relationship were at a greater risk of several adverse outcomes, including “being on public assistance, being unemployed, and having poorer educational attainment.” From Wikipedia: “The study was met with considerable criticism from many academics and scholarly organizations. Of note, only two children in the study had actually lived with homosexually partnered parents for their entire childhoods, because many of the same-sex partnered parents were in previous heterosexual marriages. Thus, negative outcomes or events cannot be attributed to having same-sex parents, because many of these children also spent their childhoods with opposite-sex parents, and experienced family disruption and parental divorce. A 2015 reanalysis raised serious questions about the validity of the study, finding misclassification of families, inconsistency in answers suggesting mischief, and evidence that many respondents did not live with their non-heterosexual parents. When these cases were excluded, differences in outcome between children raised by parents in opposite-sex and same-sex relationships largely vanished.”

“For the sake of child well-being, programs should affirm that children require and deserve both the love and nurturing of a mother and the play and protection of a father.” This clearly states that the Republicans want one man/one woman to be the only form of acceptable marriage.

Health: “…the project recommends withdrawing the abortion pill mifepristone from the market and stopping the drug from being mailed, eliminating mandated insurance coverage for the week-after pill, prohibit funding for patients traveling across state lines for reproductive health care and prohibit funding for health care centers that provide abortions.” (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/project-2025-conservative-presidential-list/story?id=111952315)

Quote from Project 2025: “The Office of the Secretary should eliminate the HHS Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force and install a pro-life task force to ensure that all of the department’s divisions seek to use their authority to promote the life and health of women and their unborn children.” Additionally, HIPAA law will be revised to assure that all fetuses are regarded as fully human beings.

 The Office of Science and Medicine will withdraw all recommendations for gender-affirming care. “…the project proposes eliminating several terms from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists” including: “sexual orientation,” “gender,” “gender equality,” “gender awareness,” “gender-sensitive” “abortion,” “reproductive health,” “reproductive rights,” “diversity, equity, and inclusion” and more.” (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/project-2025-conservative-presidential-list/story?id=111952315)

Immigration: The border will be sealed. ICE will be given full reign to arrest immigrants anywhere in the United States, as there will be no sanctuary zones. Immigrants will be evaluated for legal entry based on their skills and not on their need–“…gang violence and domestic violence are not grounds for asylum.”

The border wall will be completed. We all know how effective that will be. For one thing, most immigrants aren’t coming into this country across the border. They come in airplanes. (https://www.npr.org/2019/01/10/683662691/where-does-illegal-immigration-mostly-occur-heres-what-the-data-tell-us)

Foreign policy: End our economic relationship with China. (I hope I need not point out how economically disruptive this would be.)

All ambassadors who have liberal views or have expressed negative opinions about Trump will be fired and replaced with Trump loyalists.

Bear in mind that much of Project 2025 is based on misinformation. In the area of foreign policy, Project 2025 states, “…the Obama Administration threw the brutal regime an economic lifeline by giving hundreds of billions of dollars to the Iranian government and providing other sanctions relief.” The facts of the matter are that Obama made $1.7 billion dollar payment in non-US currency as the resolution of an arbitration case that had gone on for years. (https://apnews.com/united-states-government-fd4113419276444eba1d2a46d5c29752) Obama used the payment as leverage to free US hostages.

From Project 2025: “Shift strategic focus from assistance to growth. Reorient the focus of U.S. overseas development assistance away from stand-alone humanitarian development aid and toward fostering free market systems in African countries by incentivizing and facilitating U.S. private sector engagement in these countries.” In other words, exploit African resources to the fullest extent to the benefit of U.S. corporations and abandon humanitarian and financial aid. A return to 19th-Century-style economic colonialism.

Withdraw support from international organizations unless they directly serve U.S. interests. “.For example, the Trump Administration withdrew from, or terminated funding for, the United Nations Human Rights Council, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, and the WHO. The results were redeployment of taxpayer dollars to better uses—and other organizations “getting the message” that the United States will not allow itself and its money to be used to undermine its own interests.” A selfish and self-serving policy that typifies Project 2025 throughout.

Governance: We all are aware that Republicans want “smaller government,” even if that means destroying the value that we have built over the years. Project 2025 refers to federal employees as “…largely underworked, overcompensated, and unaccountable federal civilian workforce.” It states that federal employees are “ideologically aligned, not with the American
people—but with one another, posing a profound problem for Republican government, a government “of, by, and for” the people.” This is just untrue. Statistics show that the American people in general are “unaligned” with Republican values. For example, 62% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in most cases (https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/07/15/key-facts-about-the-abortion-debate-in-america/) A majority (57%) of adults say the U.S. hasn’t gone far enough when it comes to giving women equal rights with men. (https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/08/13/key-takeaways-on-americans-views-on-gender-equality-a-century-after-u-s-women-gained-the-right-to-vote/) This is in direct opposition to Republicans, who have taken the right to abortion away from women, and are clearly working on other means of controlling and suppressing women.

Social Services: “…according to the American Main Street Initiative’s analysis of official federal tallies—Medicare and Medicaid combined cost $17.8 trillion, while our combined federal deficits over that same span were $17.9 trillion. In essence, our deficit problem is a Medicare and Medicaid problem.” This is just a baldfaced lie. Medicare is not funded through taxes, but by individual contributions and investment. Medicare has NOTHING to do with the deficit, and Republicans are well aware of this. Medicaid is funded through a joint partnership of the states and the Federal government. Medicaid and CHIP combined are only 13% of the nation’s spending on healthcare, so it is not an obvious villain in this piece. The largest spending is 70% on something labeled “Other Federal Outlays.” (https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/faqs-on-health-spending-the-federal-budget-and-budget-enforcement-tools/) Maybe someone should be looking into “Other Federal Outlays.”

And yet, the stated intention is to end Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid. There are no plans to replace these services.

Taxes: Republicans have been unable to wean themselves from the idea that giving more money to already obscenely wealthy people will result in general prosperity. Trump gave billionaires a tax break and sent the National Debt into the stratosphere. FromProPublica: “The national debt has risen by almost $7.8 trillion during Trump’s time in office. That’s nearly twice as much as what Americans owe on student loans, car loans, credit cards and every other type of debt other than mortgages, combined, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. It amounts to about $23,500 in new federal debt for every person in the country.”(https://www.propublica.org/article/national-debt-trump)

And they want to do it again under a new Trump administration. This approach is completely false, has never worked, never will work, and will create more economic chaos. Ordinary citizens will wind up paying more than billionaires (which they already do in many cases). (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/project-2025-wants-radically-change-230008655.html)

Education: “Bureaucrats at the Department of Education inject racist, anti-American, ahistorical propaganda into America’s classrooms.” No substantiation for this is provided, and I believe it just means they don’t like historical facts–like the way slaves were treated in the United States.

“Through the CCP’s Confucius Institutes, Beijing has been just as successful at compromising and coopting our higher education system as they have at compromising and coopting corporate America.” Again, no substantiation is offered, and my basic response is, “Huh?”

The Department of Education will be “shuttered,” returning 100% of responsibility for education to the states. I think we know what the result of that will be: red-state children will be thoroughly indoctrinated in extreme right-wing ideologies, while children in blue states will get an actual education.

Unions: Re unions of public employees: “Congress should also consider whether public-sector unions are appropriate in the first place. The bipartisan consensus up until the middle of the 20th century held that these unions were not compatible with constitutional government.” Spoiler alert: they are not in favor of public employees having unions.

All unions in the Department of Homeland Security would be removed “for national security purposes.” It never states how unions would be a national security threat.

“The next Administration should make new options available to workers and push Congress to pass labor reforms that create non-union ’employee involvement organizations’ as well as a mechanism for worker representation on corporate boards.” Translation: we will replace unions with pro forma organizations within corporations composed of both workers and management. I think we all know how that one goes.

This is just a sampling of the ill-conceived, thoughtless, radical changes that Trump will be making if he is re-elected. If he is not re-elected, don’t think Project 2025 goes away. They’ll just pursue it a lot more quietly. Vote blue.